By Mike Weland
This is an open letter to Darrell
Kerby and all his ilk;
Darrell Kirby is an
educated man who was born and raised in Boundary
County, who served on the city council for more
than half his life, served a controversial term
as Mayor of the City of Bonners Ferry and
brought about changes that will serve this
community well for years to come, who sat
for awhile in the Idaho State Legislature
filling in for Shawn Keough when she couldn’t
attend her duties due to her husband’s illness,
and who had the gall to post on Facebook
critical but common sense information as regards a federal proposal to set aside most
of the West Side of Boundary County as critical
caribou habitat.
“Again.....you can't make
this stuff up,” Mr. Kerby wrote (I should have
added that he was talking about a proposal by
the US Fish and Wildlife Service to set aside
600-plus acres, most of them in Boundary County,
to accommodate an animal that doesn't seem to
want to come down here. If they ever did,
Highway 3 in Canada, where caribou are hit and
killed like deer down here, seems to dissuade
them.)
“Tony McDermott is an Idaho
State Fish & Game Commissioner,” he said ....
wait, what?! He cited an expert?
Either I’m stupid or I’m
not real smart, but having read Mr. McDermott’s
response, I can’t find the link to the full text what he said,
but that’s okay … I know it’s there, I read it
and it had words. Harsh ones.
I invite readers to look it up,
and if you find it, send me the link, his words
merit publication here, even if only to raise
controversy and argument.
I publish on-line, but I’m not
real good at the interwebs.
Anyway, IDFG
commissioner McDermott was saying
how stupid the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service proposal
is as regards setting aside 600+ square miles up
here as “caribou country.”
Mr. Kirby is clearly out of
syn … wait, WHAT?! An Idaho State Fish & Game
Commissioner said that?
That makes about as much
sense as a devout environmentalist needing
lumber or the goods of a community to build his own house
or wanting electricity, heat and other comforts, instead of
building and powering it out of entirely natural resources.
That's like asking snow to
shovel itself.
Heresy.
According to the people who
forced this issue ... and grizzlies, wolves,
mosquitoes, wolverines, lynx, fox, cougars (mmm ...
cougars!), Tasmanian devils, rabid deer and
ground squirrels notwithstanding ... the only thing
that will entice caribou back into the U.S. is
if we, the people here, set aside 600+ square miles
of territory they checked out back in the '50s
and apparently didn't like, and keep our human
butts out of it ... except for our scientific
endeavor of introducing more bear, wolves,
wolverines and rabid squirrels into it.
If we only do that, our San
Francisco Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals says, the caribou,
who seem to be happy where they are up in
Canada, and who are getting run over regularly
on Highway 3 in Canada ... effectively
discouraging them from traveling south,
will romp here in great numbers, be
happy, eat U.S. lichen and breed like rabbits.
The elite neighbors we have on our Ninth Circuit will then have a reason to visit
here, they and their kin will flock here in great numbers, and our
economy will thrive.
Thank God for judicial logic.
Mr. Kirby, you grew up here
and you should know better than to argue.
Turning the natural
resources the forefathers of this community
worked so hard to extract so as to provide the
products and services needed to build the houses and homes
for the people of the world is no longer a
viable option … the real money, the future
economy, is in the stock market, retirement
income and tourism.
In today’s economy, nobody
needs real products that you can put your hands
around, build or make to build a home, heat the winters or eat.
We no longer need to transport or refine those
products. Instead, we should create "art."
The world has enough of all
that other stuff, and if we need more, we can always
call upon places where there are fewer or no
environmental regulations and where people who
are poor will make it for us, and
ship it in. It makes sense economically in more
affordable goods, and it's not taking place in
any of our back yards. If they get sick, ruin
their environment and die, that's okay.
They're foreigners ... not
the good citizens of our country. They'll learn
what we did once upon a time. Eventually.
I can’t understand why you,
Mr. Kerby, don’t clearly see that what we should do, as a
community, is adopt to the new, green tourism
economy … It’s the wave of the future! If it's
not happening in our backyard, it's green. We're
freed the noise dust and nuisance.
The lumber and sand and
gravel, cement, ore and raw materials upon which
this nation was built, of which this county has
in such abundance? Pshaw! We have enough! All we
have to do now is recycle.
If we get the caribou back,
Darrell Kerby, the tourists will come, and we
will no longer need the blessings or the hard
work, sweat or toil by which we extract
the
myriad natural resources so abundant around us … especially
not the logging ... or the farming ... or the
mining … industries that nearly
ruined this county for the awesome potential
that is tourism.
Just look at the year past.
Over a period of a
generation, our federal government,
at little to no expense to the folks who work
live and work here except to cost them their jobs, pride and
heritage, not to mention kept them out of the
woods their parents, grandparents and
great-grandparents once frequented both to work
and play, has done so well
at furthering our national interests that efforts to recover the
grizzly bear have borne such fruition that tourists flocked to our region
to figure out why we’re now shooting them when
they threaten our children, or why they’re now
eating us.
Not even the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service scientests seem to agree with
the courts that if we set aside habitat, stay
out of it with our stinky bi-pedal bad selves, a
species that may or may not be endangered
because they were once seen visiting here will
come back ... and isn't that like trying to say
the Huns were indigenous to Europe because they
were unwelcome tourists once?
Historical evidence shows
that the caribou who once visited are back home,
using Canadian roads to reach Canadian logging
equipment because Canadians like logging and the
caribou like strolling down logging roads and
eating the grease off the skidders.
Given these facts, sir, you
can’t deny that if we set aside 600 square miles
of North Idaho and western Washington, what we're
actually going to save is the overabundant pileated U.S peckerhead ... a species that
lives primarily in the law offices of
lowland U.S. cities and which depend on loud
outcries, lawyers and charitable donations,
coupled with a loud, well funded but not earned effort
to monger irrational fear, stoked by
the nation’s major media, who accept ad dollars
to tell you that giving $1 a day will make save
the life of a child or a dog, and you will earn the
great comfort of knowing that
you've made a real difference.
Those people, Mr. Kirby,
deserve great credit, because their
organizations have some of the richest coffers
in the world with which to hire more attorneys and
lobby justices. If it were otherwise, they'd run
out of starving kids by whom to attract our
continued donations.
Don’t let on that those
fine, global minded people aren’t doing their
best to look after us, or that what happens here
doesn’t affect them.
Lord forbid that we revert
back to the 1950s and early 1960s when the local
economy was booming thanks to hard working local
men and women ... when our loggers and miners
built roads, cleared paths, made a real and
tangible living and generated an honest product
and honest wealth ... wealth that converted a
natural resource into a product of benefit to
people the world over.
The people with the money,
big cars and fine houses who move here because
of this region's great beauty need us
more than we've ever needed them; someone,
after all, has to be there to mow their lawn,
build their fence, plow their snow.
It seems incongruous ...
I've met a lot of environmentalists, I've
interviewed them over the years; loggers,
miners, builders, farmers, people who work sun up to sun
down and depend on the environment for their
living, and who cherish it.
They remember the hard
work, sweat, sacrifice and toil of their
forebears in scratching out a meager but
fulfilling living, and they're proud to carry on
that legacy.
I've yet to meet a
pileated peckerhead
that (and I say that, not who
... there is a distinction), doesn't like
fundraisers, pleading for more money for kids,
causes or
animals they'll never see in person except
for the occasional photo op, or that don't already
live in a fair house ... often surrounded by a
metal gate … who only ask from the local economy
the people who serve them and the needs of their
comfort.
They like the loggers who
sell them the firewood to keep their hearths
bright ... it lets them stay smug and
warm and protect their environment, even while they
criticize those who ply the century old
livelihoods that made this place great, and
strip away very ability of the very hard-working
ethos that made this place what it is.
But they do have good reason
to complain ... They invested the money they
worked so hard for, most often those low-lying
cities in other places, so as to
enjoy their retirement years in the most
beautiful place they've ever seen on earth.
But now, the heirs of those
who made this such a great place might continue
the legacy of their parents and forbears, and that might infringe on the
pilieated peckerhead's "right of enjoyment
of the use of their land," for
which they will sue at the least provocation.
See what I'm saying,
Darrell? The things you and your family worked
for and stood for ... hard work, to create a solid product and true
wealth earned by the sweat of the brow, the
pride in raising a family and watching children
and grandchildren prosper, of friends and years-long kinship with neighbors
... of building a modest life and a
legacy in a place where living is hard ... that
doesn't matter any more.
The pileated North American
peckerheads that seem to have settled here
lately have more money and better attorneys ...
and for now, they always seem to win.
|